|
If the victim testifies, but changes the
story, e.g., now claims there was no assault or that the defendant
was not the assailant,
then the prosecutor may introduce prior
statements of the victim that are:
Excited
utterances (Rule 11-803(B))
Present
sense impressions (Rule 11-803(A))
Statements
of identification (Rule 11-801(D)(1)(c)
and the prosecution may also impeach the
witness by confronting the witness with either or both of:
Prior
inconsistent statements made under oath (Rule 11-801(D)(1)(a))
Other
prior inconsistent statements (Rule 11-613(B))
|